Monday 11 November 2013

New Controversy in Pakistan !


When drone killed Mehsood !

People love to turn their ears on controversies because it is the only thing which we can sell easily. When I was a boy, someone told me, everything in this world fell in two categories; right or wrong. Now I am an adult, but still putting harsh topics in childish categories.

Most things in the world aren't wholly wrong or wholly right. It’s our perception about issues which make anything good or bad. When I was a child, I thought God was the only one who saw good and wrong; black and white. Now I am not a child, I can realize that God is the God who can see the black, white and the grey, too.

Drone attacks killed TTP leader; new tax net for people; Malala became heroine; parliament resolutions for Pakistan safety. All these issues have some good and bad points. Drone attack killed TTP leader but damage Pakistan sovereignty, raised several issues and security concerns. Jamat-e-Islami (JI) gave Mr. Hakeemullah a degree of martyr after his killing in drone attack; other politicians condemned it. I know, only God has the authority to recognize people rightly; but was surprised from statement. May be JI has some links with god. Hold down, don’t you think they are just diversifying the issue. Nobody raised the issue of Pakistan’s Sovereignty.

What’s wrong in it if terrorists killed 35000+ innocent people in Pakistan? What’s wrong in it if drone killed few more thousand innocents? Both are damaging Pakistan national sovereignty. I have learned something interesting about politics. In politics, the reaction to a controversy is more enlightening and important than the details of allegations themselves. Don’t you agree? Probably yes. You may have your own point of view. I am not forcing you to agree with.

When I was a child, my teacher usually told me, what you need to learn is the difference between right and wrong in different areas of life. And once you learn the difference, you must always choose the right. Many mouth, thousand words, numerous concepts. Everyone seems to be right in the world of news. I want to pick the good points about this news but what it will be? I am still confused. Is it a new zone of war or another Security concern?

In the war of terror, Pakistanis think of role of the US is generally negative. Any incidents of terrorism cause anger against the terrorist organizations and also create frustration with the United States. According to Pew Global Polls only 17% of Pakistanis have a positive view of the US and only 11% see it as a useful partner in the War on Terror.

Government officials are of view point that Pakistan is fighting war for its survival. They are arresting terrorists in major cities; busy in fighting militants in FATA; bombardment in Taliban hideouts. USA killed several terrorist in drone attacks. Nek Muhammad was killed in 2004, Baitullah Mehsud in 2009; Maulvi Nazeer and Wali-ur-Rehman in 2013. Nobody declared them Shaheed (martyr) at that time. When Hakeem ullah Mehsood tried to negotiate government then suddenly drone comes in and killed Mehsood. Few politicians supposed this act as danger for Pakistan survival. After one day of his death. New controversy starts in Pakistan’s media channels. This controversy was on calling Mehsood a Dog or a Martyr? They forgot to highlight sovereignty of Pakistan. Thanks to JI and JUI (f) for diversifying the issue.

Pakistan civil societies view USA as unfaithful ally. I am not going to put all things in one category. In short, to me, when people become ignorant and corrupt; they are incapable of exercising their sovereignty and this is true for Pakistan. I am against killings. I believe in judiciary and not in extra judicial murders.

---
Aqib Maniar





Friday 8 November 2013

RANN


Film Review: RANN movie !
The film is just the film and nothing else. In the climax of Rann, Amitabh Bachchan, a senior respected journalist delivers a news item about the responsibility of media. Earlier on in the same film, he agreed to air anonymously received sting-operation footage that implicates the country's Prime Minister for his involvement in Muzafarnagar riots. How a senior respected journalist like him forgot the basic principal of verifying the source of news and its authenticity. What do you think?
                        
Rann is ill-researched film. Director tried to expose the links of political parties and television channels but he failed to do. Bachchan's character Malik is an ethical, principled channel Indian 24 head who's losing the TRP . His competitor headlines 24/7 channel believes in packaging news entertainingly. Malik sons’ gets advise from his industrialist brother-in-law about making profits. He makes a discreet deal with a corrupt politician to air a fake sting framing the Prime Minister in exchange for enough money to save his channel and to set up few more.

The sting footage aired on so-called respected news channel and story read by ethical and unsuspecting journalist. Footage takes down the PM and helps the corrupt politician to get the primer ship. But before long an earnest reporter Purab unearths the truth. He approaches the boss with the information and took another sting operation; Malik Sr eventually exposes everyone involved in the scandal.

Rann is a boring film and professionals already knew the predictable climax. This film may somewhat portrays Hindi news journalism and concept of Yellow journalism and sting journalism in India. Varma uses crazy camera moves; tight close ups and moving frames, trying to create the drama in the background music that script fails to deliever.

Mr Malik’s son commits suicide and after this Malik handover channel to Purab. Film tries to potray good relations between Muslim and Hindus. But it is out of context.

Performances ; : Everyone puts up an impressive performance. Amitabh Bachchan's performance is no doubt very good.  He lifts other characters. Riteish successfully tries a make-over as a serious journalist who believes the mike is mightier than the sword. Paresh Rawal fits the image of a corrupt politician. Sudeep grabs attention, he looks senior journalist.

Story: it is narrated well but anyone can judge the climax, and role of sting operations in media. It’s not new like the film in 1976.

Dialogue:
Amitabh Bachchan's speech in the climax about pure true ethical journalism is like a cumin seed in a camel's mouth.

Music: didn’t find any great song, which we as a people love to listen again .

Cinematography:  director uses his camera stylishly to create an impressive canvas.

Visuals: Fails to create a great visionary newsroom. All journalist and researchers are in relaxing moods.